Rely Reacts: Resident Evil Reboot

Rely Reacts: Resident Evil Reboot

Every so often there are topics that come up within the gaming industry that incite expansive discussion and debate, with a definitive conclusion not quite attainable. The conclusion however is rarely the most interesting factor of such debates, the discussion itself is what is most enticing to many people. In the Rely Reacts series, the staff here at Rely On Horror will chime in on a particular topic, each offering our own personal points of view, arguments, and conclusions.  We aim not to offer a definitive conclusion of our own either, the only goal of this series is to highlight a variety of perspectives and continue to grease the cogs of conversation.

Recently news came out of Capcom that they would like to see their wildly popular Resident Evil series return to it’s roots, stating that a complete series reboot is indeed a possibility for the franchise.  While traditionally fan reaction to such an idea is generally met with hostility, there is a great number of long time fans that are open to and supportive of the idea. Now that’s not to say that the majority of fans want it to happen, there are just as many if not more fans against the idea of a franchise reboot as well. With such sweeping and varying opinions on a potential Resident Evil reboot, I thought it would be interesting to see what the staff here at Rely On Horror’s collective thoughts were on the reboot proposal. Each of us has quite a history with the series, and much like everyone else our feelings on the Resident Evil franchise being rebooted varies significantly from one another. I posed this simple question to my fellow editors: “Do you think Resident Evil should or should not be rebooted, and why?” As you’re about to see, the response produced the most varied of results.

Janus, Senior Editor

The idea of the classic Resident Evils being rebooted for current or next gen consoles would initially seem like a great idea. Given Capcom’s propensity for remaking their older games, it seems like it’s almost a sure thing to reboot the entire Resident Evil series in glorious HD. But that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a good idea.

For one, the Resident Evil story isn’t even finished. Hundreds of hours spent on a story that may not ever continue. Given how worthy Capcom sees the whole reboot idea, Resident Evil may not ever have a proper conclusion. What if they get right back up to Resident Evil 5 and then talk about rebooting it again? To me, rebooting the series is almost code for “We don’t know here the hell to go from here to keep you buying our stuff.”
Granted, there are some people who say right back to Capcom, “just keep going.” There were tonnes of people who loved Resident Evil 6 just the way it was, but there were just as many, including many members of the press, who were pretty disappointed. I haven’t even finished it yet.

So how does Capcom see to win those former fans back? By rebooting the entire series to try to strike a nostalgic bone in us? Well there’s no guarantee that Resident Evil will be rebooted as an actual survival horror. Capcom is still a business and they’re still responsible to their shareholders, who want the company to sell as many games to as many people as possible. They might claim to understand that survival horror will always be a niche market, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they’ll create a new game that showcases that understanding and not another five Resident Evil 6s. Rebooting a series into what they’ve already claimed will not sell as well as an action game just doesn’t sound right.

I think my biggest qualm with the idea of a reboot is that the story that we’ve already been told and come to accept as truth could be completely changed. What if in the reboot Jill didn’t make it out of Raccoon City? What if Barry just didn’t exist? What if instead of a steely-eyed strong and mysterious man, Wesker was actually a womanizing douchebag who always longed to see his son again (spoiler alert) so that it better fit the story of Resident Evil 6?

RelyReactsSec2

Kyle CampbellContributing editor

Resident Evil is to me is what The Legend of Zelda and Super Mario Brothers franchises are to many other gamers, that is it was the series seminal in shaping both what I’ve come to enjoy most about the videogame medium and what helped define me as a gamer. I’ve been with the series since the very beginning, staying up far too late on school nights exploring the Spencer Mansion, reading through S. D. Perry’s novel adaptions numerous times, and begging my mom to buy me Resident Evil: The Director’s Cut just so I could get my hands on the Resident Evil 2 demo disk. I was obsessed with the universe and it’s characters, I could never get enough of it.

Now all that said, I could not be more in favor of the Resident Evil series being rebooted and getting a fresh start, because nearly everything I once loved about the series has been gone for quite some time. While it was not the first survival horror game ever to be released, Resident Evil was undoubtedly what brought the genre to the forefront and made it popular in the mid to late 90′s. Which is always a funny thing to think about now, because the more recent entries in the series like Resident Evil 5 and Resident Evil 6  are about as survival horror as Skrillex is classic rock. It’s no secret that the past few entries in the series have had more of an action focus, that in and of itself is not a bad thing. Resident Evil 4 was a massive departure for the series and brought about action focused gameplay, but it remembered that it was still Resident Evil, the regenerator sequences were amongst the most intense the series has ever had in my opinion. More importantly however is Resident Evil 4 was a magnificently well crafted game whether it was horror or not, the same however cannot be said for the likes of Operation Raccoon City or Resident Evil 6.

As for things like unresolved story, plot, and character resolutions that would undoubtedly come about as the result of a reboot, I only have one thing to say about that: I don’t care at all. Now how can someone that’s been with the series as long as I have say this you ask? Well the answer is blunt and simple, and that is in my opinion the quality of the writing in Resident Evil ranges from passable to awful. The characters are so flat and boring that they can barely be considered stereotypes, and they hardly(if ever) have arcs. The overarching plot and story are so convoluted and abundant with plot holes that it’s laughable just to think about it in any sort of serious light at times. Resident Evil 6‘s story in particular was embarrassingly bad, many of the cutscenes were nothing more than action movie schlock. Now just to reiterate, this is just my opinion, and if you like the storytelling in Resident Evil then that’s fine, for many years I loved it too. However now that I’ve matured considerably since the days of the original Playstation, I just can’t take the story seriously anymore.

What I care about more than anything, is Resident Evil being a horror game again, I want it to return to it’s roots. I’m not saying it has to have the old static camera angles or typewriters to save your game, only that it is once again the front runner in the survival horror space.  Reboots are often exactly what a franchise needs to gravitate to new heights of quality. I mean just look at what Christopher Nolan did to the Batman film franchise for proof of that, Joel Schumacher nearly killed off that franchise forever with the dreadful Batman & Robin. Then Nolan came along brought with him everything that was already good about Batman, threw out the schlock from the previous series and brought his own take on the characters while still treating the source material with respect. Maybe in the hands of a new developer, no longer confined to the mess the series has become, the same could happen to Resident Evil, at least that’s what I’m hoping for.

Casper BronmansContributing editor

Going back to the roots of something is an easy thing to say, but to get there you first need to tip over a tree. Give it a few chops and the tree will go down, but if you don’t plan ahead, then it will likely cause a lot of damage in its fall. In simpler words: “fans are going to be really pissed off if you screw it up.” My experience with this series has been very limited, so I find myself in a unique position. As a guy who was in primary school at the time this franchise started rolling, I have always found getting into it a little too difficult, since the many entries and famously convoluted lore always scared me off.

When I joined Rely on Horror, a friend of mine gifted me Resident Evil 4 and that was my first major experience. I tried the demo for five and played six at First Look 2012, but it just seemed too daunting a task to get a grip on the story after all I had missed. This reboot is an opportunity for me to correct that.

I want the series to start all over again, but with the overall story planned out well ahead to avoid another dive into evil midget territory. Keep it serious, keep is scary and (most importantly) keep the characters. Jill Valentine, Albert Wesker, Leon Kennedy… those are all fantastic characters that are integral to the popularity of the franchise. I would also prefer to see a return to the old camera angles and controls of the first game, albeit a bit more polished. It may seem very backwards and inconvenient, but it’s what gave the first few games a sense of uniqueness (I know Alone in the Dark did it first, but this still applies). As for which studio should handle the game… I am going to say one with some fresh and new talent, but with some guidance from a veteran developer or two; It would be an interesting experience. It should also definitely stay under Capcom and it should most definitely not be outsourced to another big name developer.

Those are my wishes at least.

RelyRactsRE5

Brent CookContributing editor

As a long time fan of the Resident Evil series, I find myself torn after the announcement that Capcom may in fact be rebooting the series. On one hand, I’ve been waiting for a fitting ending for these  characters who I’ve spent so much time with, that I’ve “grown up” with, and while I didn’t hate Resident Evil 6, it sure didn’t provide much in the way of answering those burning questions that I’ve had about the mysteries of the series. Instead of clearing up some of the murky and hidden back stories that we’ve been teased about, RE6 only succeeded in creating new stories, doing nothing to solve the questions lingering from past installments. Chris, Jill, Leon, and the others all deserve their proper ending, and it would be a shame to see Resident Evil 6 as their last attempt at putting an exclamation on these characters.

At the same time, I find myself craving the Resident Evil of old, desperate to return to the creepy, dark, narrow hallways, creaky doors, and everything that made the original games so memorable. While Resident Evil 4 remains my favorite game in the series, it unfortunately seems to have started a chain reaction that has completely removed the series from its survival horror roots, forcing Capcom to thrust it into the Action/Third Person Shooter genre. I know it’s been said before, but Chris punching a boulder? Really? There’s just no place for that in Resident Evil, or survival horror for that matter. In the original game, if a door was locked, Chris had to scour the mansion for key with a shield on it, not punch the door down in a fit of rage. You had to think; you had to use your resources and strategize to explore each room and figure it out. Love it or hate it, THAT was Resident Evil and that’s the Resident Evil that I want back.

While a reboot would take away something solid for us fans to hold onto as an ending for our heroes, and maybe even the likelihood of us ever seeing the much requested Resident Evil 2 remake, returning to its survival horror roots seems like it’s the only option for the series in order to bring back its all of its fans and become great once again, and that’s just not possible with Resident Evil in its current incarnation.

 

As promised, our four editors that contributed to the first entry in the Rely Reacts series brought an abundance of interesting points to ponder further on the prospect of Resident Evil being rebooted. We’re wondering what our readers think though, do your feelings match up with any of ours here on Rely On Horror or do you have your own perspective and opinion on the potential reboot? Let us know in the comments below!

(Special thank you to Whitney for creating the fantastic featured image)

  • http://www.facebook.com/williambirkin1 John-Paul Conway

    A reboot. Something about that saddens me for the simple reason of if they did a full on reboot and started fresh then the last 17 years of Resident Evil will then become pointless to the new games. Just think in the rebooted series Chris never would of saw that first iconic zombie. Jill never would of fought Nemesis. Leon would of never been cheesy. Barry would of never said “Jill Sandwich”. It would be very upsetting for me. So I am against the idea.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=652663967 Dc Evans

      LOL…Jill Sandwich. It’s a classic! And what about the ever so irritating “ADA…WAIT!” I can’t see the franchise without that! LOL.

    • http://www.facebook.com/kyle.campbell.73113 Kyle Campbell

      This is the argument Star Trek fans use against the 2009 JJ Abrams movie, a reboot does not erase the last 17 years of Resident Evil. All your games, DVD’s, and novels are all still valid and can still be read/watched/played.

      • http://www.facebook.com/williambirkin1 John-Paul Conway

        But the story will never be finished Star Trek (from what I know at least) had ended by the time J.J Abrams movie has came out. Resident Evil has not ended and I would be more than happy for a reboot after the series has came to a conclusion but until then I am against it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=652663967 Dc Evans

    To be quite honest, I would like 1 or 2 more games to wrap up plots. If they made the game as long as Resident Evil 6 is, I think 1 game would be sufficient. With that said, I also feel that the series could be rebooted. Perhaps, hand us a whole new set of characters (Just an idea…Don’t start a mob). With Capcom wanting to express produce these games, they should consider putting out the end of the initial series out in the same year as the reboot game. I don’t mind if they reboot the franchise as long as they provide closure for the original series. They are considering doing this with the live-action films as well (shut up…I know you hate the live action movies. Everyone knows…we’ve heard enough of it). I think my biggest concern with the reboot would be, are they going to make the same mistakes again? They can’t go back to solid survival horror without worrying about financial gain, so would they go completely action/horror like they did with 4, 5, and 6? What made the original games, 1,2,and 3, classic was the puzzle solving, the minimized views, the eerie settings, and the save feature that left you scrambling to find an ink ribbon as you’re being pummeled by various creatures. I don’t think that could be recreated in this era of gaming with much financial success. As nice as it would be to have the final game of the original series and the first game of a reboot series out in the same year…I think Capcom would best succeed by taking a break from the franchise for a few years. (I know…agony without Resident Evil…The HORROR!…But we’ve done it before). They, like was said in the OP, need to sit down and come up with a full story arch that spans several games…and stick to it. Give us a final goal…as opposed to a new outbreak and new baddie…Wesker died and I think Resident Evil 6 was really lacking the Resident Evil feel without him. Alas, this is all my opinion…so take it with a shot of tequila and a lime and have a wonderful night.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Dakotaen Danny Høy

    I stopped playing Resident Evil when it stopped being a survival/horror game, so I’m all for it. 4 was good, but not great, and everything since then has just been absolute trash (in my oppinion). In all honesty though, I won’t believe Capcom’s word on the whole “going back to its roots” matter until I see it, and till then, I’m not supporting the RE franchise either.

    • tigerspaw

      I agree, while Revelations was the scariest game in a very long time, it still never really scared me. I guess I’m just desensitized? As long as the characters spew out corny dialogue and look fashionable while doing it, it’s incredibly hard to let the game scare me. If a reboot occurs, I’d love for them to approach the series with a more serious tone, and lose the terrible lines. Since the games have become action oriented, they have felt like a Japanese love letter to American action hero movies.. smh

      • Jeremy Saylor

        I don’t know where you people get the idea that Revelations was scary at all more than 5 or 6. or more survival. or more horror. or any less of a linear shoot bang.

  • http://www.facebook.com/de.c.davy De Ceuninck Davy

    I was a big fan of Resident evil it was my favorite game franchise. I loved it right away from the original it was just awsome. 4 I didn’t really like but I could still forgive, after 5 I just quited playing new entries and gave up hope. They destroyed the fanchise as a horror survival game. They just lost all the ways to convince a next game could be a horror survival game. So to go back to its roots of survival horror a reboot would be needed. If they are not aiming for real survival horror they shouldn’t even bother to reboot the franchise. I loved the old games and I hope if they do reboot it they follow it up in the footsteps of Resident evil Remake. Its still a masterpiece now today and I just love it.

  • Dobber

    If there going to reboot, they can do it in so many ways without changing the main story, have a prequel on how umbrella got started. Go back to mansion play as george trevor or have an origins story. Even better Play as enrico marini from stars bravo team, hes goes on a seperate path from rebecca then leading to his death in the cave, because it makes you think what did he get up to from the start of zero then meeting him in the umbrella labs then finally getting shot in the first game, because the story would be intresting because he could have fought a tyrant at the end of the game rendering him wounded and also learning of weskers betrayal, birkin could have activated a tyrant to stop him from escaping and after the battle he is wounded takes a rest thinking he’s going to be ok and then shot. There is so much they can do before the original events without tampering with the main story arc and i hope capcom take notice, because they will piss off die hard fans whos been loyal from day one.

    • http://facebook.com/y2dan Y2Dan

      I like the idea of maybe having a prequal to the main story. Here’s how i’d like to see it.

      I’d like to see the game start of slightly earlier, prior to the events of
      searching for Bravo Teams helicopter so you get to see how well some of Alpha team worked together.

      I’d like to see the game start of slightly earlier, prior to the events of searching for Bravo Teams helicopter so you get to see how well some of Alpha team worked together.

      It could start with a quick story (which could also be a prologue to get you used to the controls etc) where you start off at the police station and get reports of a murder in an old “unused” umbrella laboratory in Raccoon City.

      During the time in the laboratory they could discover small hints of the Arklay mansion and experiments that have been going on there.

      Once a discovery gets made, an urgent call from HQ indicates that Bravo Teams Helicopter has gone missing during their mission to check out the prison van (Billy Coen) and Alpha team need to get back and investigate.. Thus begins Resident Evil.

      I’d like to be able to maybe explore parts of the police station gathering reports of the laboratory at the start. The “unused” laboratory could be made claustrophobic, dark, and creepy while you explore. The Forest and helicopter wreckage area could be exploreable while you find clues to the disappearance of Bravo team. Running from the dogs at the start should also be playable.

  • http://twitter.com/Gamerboy16 Ruben

    I would like to finish the story before even attempting to start a new story. RE6 finished up some story as far as Sherry, Leon, and Ada but left Chris open for a new game, Ada still needs more games, and Jill & Claire need some closure as well as Rebecca because the ladies haven’t had much exposure in current timeline games.

  • http://www.facebook.com/murphy.pham Murphy Pham

    just no…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Taylor-Dean/100001263540965 Taylor Dean

    Just reboot the story. There is no conclusion in sight to this series. The lore is muddled and fucked up. Instead of drawing from the expansive lore, they just throw more shit onto the pile and call it a day with more flat characters, stupid villains, and thin stories.

    • tigerspaw

      Yes, thank you. Amen to the max times infinity. You described my feelings on RE perfectly. I’ve been a huge fan of the series since RE2, and I’m disappointed with how Capcom seems to just let the series go. Each game adds another unnecessary layer to the plot that’s already busting at the seams with unresolved & forgotten plots/characters.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Taylor-Dean/100001263540965 Taylor Dean

        Yup! Where’s Billy, Barry, Rebecca, Carlos? Four characters they are loved just as much as Chris and Leon and Claire and Jill, yet they’ve just poofed.

        I imagine the first RE focusing on Chris/Jill experiencing the mansion together so we aren’t fighting about whose story is canon, and let’s see Wesker as a good guy this time around! Imagine RE Code Veronica done right where Alfred and Alexia are totally insane but not cheesy as fuck.

        Oh, and not make Umbrella run by a bunch of fucktards this time.

        • tigerspaw

          Yeah, let’s lose all the stereotypical Russian villains that were so grossly introduced in more than one title.. ugh! And the way they just made the Tyrant incredibly goofy as fuck in RE Umbrella Chronicles. Less Sci-Fi, more sick experimental horror. PLEASE!

  • tigerspaw

    I’m down for a reboot. The story line makes no sense, and I’m sick of all these fucking clones. Hardly any of the game’s subplots are resolved and plots take forever to progress, and have been pretty anti-climactic (RE5). This needs to be rebooted like the new Tomb Raider. Same basic idea and all the same characters, but rewrite the script. Also, I’d love for the story line to be written by American or at least non-Japanese. I don’t like their “story telling” style, it always ends up convoluted clones/etc Very unoriginal. Make the story line a lot more realistic and let’s finally lose the cheesyness of it all and maybe gamers will be interested in this franchise again.

    • http://www.facebook.com/luau.design.df Luis Guimarães

      Real japanese story lines are actually very good. Japanese stories meant to appeal to western audiences are crap.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Daekaox Jorge Costa

    lets face the facts, resident evil is tarting to lack in story quality and at the same time is becoming a more action base gamen and less survival horror, but the question is: what is selling today?
    the concept of markting evry game company is sarting to adopt is to make games that are liked by the majoraty of players, and today the majoraty of players shoters, exemples of this are Mass Effect 3, and in my opinon, Dead Space 3 ( wich i sometime call also mass efect 3 due to similarities, also im starting to dislike EA).
    i still, havent played RE6, but its hard for me to belive that its that bad, plus there is a way to revive the series widout a reboot, put a couple of dlc’s with the gaps in 6, and work betther and learn with the coments of players to do the 7.
    and why i’m against reboot?
    1- the char may keep the name but loose the personality or aspect we are used to
    2- the game itself can chage and end( becoming even more action, or rebooting tho the weird camera angles, due to the fact that too much action is not RE, an the first titles would now only appeal to a selected few, not enoth to sell)
    3- Devil May Cry (i know i almost did)(while i only folowed from the 3rd dante isnt that thing, and i do not apreciate having headhaces and having that i think is near to the sensation of eating shrooms)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mason-Johnson/552162957 Mason Johnson

    Remake/Reboot the series. We’ve already got a remake of the original Resident Evil. So why not just make a REmake of 2,3 code:veronica and continue remaking the series but when we get to #4 it gets made into a different story line. No more Las Plaga but Umbrella doesn’t fall. and just keep adding to that story line.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mason-Johnson/552162957 Mason Johnson

      Let’s be honest. yes the game play in 4 is amazing. But the story took it in the ASS HARD!!!!

      • tigerspaw

        I totally agree. I remember playing through RE4 for the first time and everytime I got closer to the end I was expecting some sort of awesome plot revelation, or some sort of resolve to SOMETHING, all the game did was add more questions and didn’t move anything along.

  • http://trylobyte.tumblr.com/ Nawawi B

    Well here’s my idea for a ‘re-boot’ – Remake RE2/3 into one game. Story wise, it will be a sequel to REmake but it branches off from the old RE2. So you’ll have the old timeline (RE 2 to RE6) and then you’ll have the new timeline (RE2/3 Remake and any new games afterwards). It retains the characters and also give an opportunity to do a better storyline without the past inconsistencies. Two things: 1) The story would have to be planned carefully now 2) Avoid devolving into RE 5/6 action.

    That’s one way to do a reboot and please the fans at the same time. But personally, I want a complete reboot with new characters. The characters are ‘badasses’ now and the story is going nowhere. There are unanswered questions but the main ones (Spencer/Wesker plan) have been answered. For those complaining about how a reboot would make the past storylines meaningless – come on! You can still play and enjoy the past games! Just treat it as a different universe

  • http://twitter.com/uzairisweird UZI

    The new game should be hack n slash game with Alice as the main character, as you gain power ups you can HULK SMASH more zombies and even FLY… While teaming up with the Avengers and Martha Stewart.

  • James

    Everybody has that favorite franchise and mine is RE. I loved it since the very first one. Though 4 was an amazing game it did not feel too scary but it terms of game play evolution it did a great job for the franchise. I did love the fix camera angel but the over the shoulder is a great way to go. I mean look at the first Dead Space super awesome and scary too. As a die hard RE fan I loved 5. I think it was disappointing in the sense that it did not surpass 4 as a sequel should (and no scares what so ever) but it was very fun still. I had a bad feeling about 6. When I saw the reviews I kind of ignored them but that game was crap I am sorry but it was. I keep lying to myself as i played Leon’s scenario that it wasent. In the end I could not keep playing after that haven’t finished it yet. But I think a soft reboot is needed that takes off after 3 since raccoon city is blown up. I think they should remake 2/3 together like the original RE gamecube remake and evolve the story like they did to the original. Then start another timeline. I hate that we have not heard anything from barry, rebecca, billy, and carlos too, but maybe they can include this characters instead of using new ones.

  • Moy

    Fuck reboots. We nerd remakes with classic gameplay

  • http://twitter.com/monsterocket Patrick Allen

    I don’t think that Resident Evil returning to its survival horror roots necessarily means they would need to do a complete reboot. I like the idea of a prequel taking place anywhere between the 50′s and the 80′s. In fact, the next game could take place during 2 timelines. The first half following Wesker, and maybe Annette and William, from long ago to better explain the origins of Sherry and Jake. The other half would take place after the events of Resident Evil 6 with Sherry and Jake learning about that troubled past. Either way, I want to fight zombies in a retro setting…

  • William

    The story has been out of control for a long time now. That’s part of the games! They will never resolve. And to completely jettison the whole thing, with all the characters I’ve come to love and all the legends, I’d feel completely slapped in the face. What I hope they mean by a reboot is that they want to tell a new story. I don’t see why it can’t remain in the same universe, but make it parallel to what has been told already. A prequel would be awesome, they could tell a period piece from the 70s for instance with all new characters.

    I remember when resident evil 2 came out, I was 11, and I read an interview with Mikami.ill never forget what he said. Verbatim, ‘We’re going to use new characters each time, to keep the fear going’. They forgot that pretty quick,but it’s always stuck in my mind. Mikami knew what he he saying, that things would be bogged down by story when the gaming experience is what is truly important.

    And while I’m on a roll, I want two dlc scenarios for RE6, one ala Lost in Nightmares and one ala Desperate Escape. Claire + new character for a horror style scenario, and…wait for it… Carlos and Sheva for an action sequence. They would be awesome together. Maybe that’ll tie some loose ends off before a ‘reboot’, and let us make the most out of the last resident evil of this generation

  • Thomas

    As long as they actually give us “survival horror” back again im happy…….

  • Dylan Osuba

    just reboot resident evil and turn it back to what it used to be survival horror this action/shooter crap does not belong in games like this it makes the resident evil games look hell of corny

  • Henrikm

    I have said it before as some already mentioned here already.
    Capcom seems to bring new lore with each title but seemingly not close some which they created since before.
    Alex Wesker while I think he/she is a plot device taken out from Capcom’s ass why not have Alex in RE6 instead of yet a new villian instead.
    Plus many had hoped the plot between Leon and Ada would get a conclusion similar to Chris,Jill and Wesker in RE5.
    But YET AGAIN she showed up and some minor interaction,saving Leon or Leon saving her then once again she just disappears on some new mission or what. Nothing new added too those two.
    Also seen Capcom’s takes on “reboot” know.
    If they plan to reboot the series yet again do it lorewise aswell.
    I dont care if Chris and Jill comes back again in another non-STAR version maybe just as a couple just trying to survive a Zombie outbreak or new names all together.
    Just reboot it entirly.

  • http://www.facebook.com/steven.simonson.92 Steven Simonson

    No brainer. Having alpha bravo and the city incident in one game would be great. No need to milk it, we know what going to happen. Games are on such a larger scale now, so this isnt thatout there. Also the zombies! Zombies are everywhere , Re started it but needs to stand out. Bring back real time Crimson heads (who would become lickers… next gen lickers!) T-virus (re-animation) G-virus (mutation) and I think the animals should have their own virus (hunters and big bugs/ animals) I thought it was dumb that the t-virus doubled as re-animation and some kind of steroid. Bring back multiple endings, and multiple characters.

  • Brian

    I’m on the fence learning towards reboot. Yeah, It’d be nice to finish the story and all the character arcs they’ve created, but the story is so muddled and confusing at this point, so many characters that simply cease to exist, so many unexplained elements, that the chance of them doing a finale with any decent sense of closure will be all but impossible. Maybe they could do like one last giant game with all the characters getting a chapter, but all in all I say reboot. start from scratch.

  • Rich

    Or they could just end the story…by killing everyone.

  • Stratajim

    I regret to admit that I think resident evil needs a reboot, but they need to hire a new, experienced, crew. I, for one, do not know how many studios have worked on the franchise, but It took them 15 years to finally release a platinum selling game where you can move and shoot. They need to sit down and take notes from dead space 1, and pay special attention to the Dead Space audio. There is no shame in taking what someone else does and making it way better. I, personally, have found my quench for survival horror in dead space.